|
Prepared by.... Shanika
Kosarat M.D.
Thanyawee Puthanakit M.D
|
|
What is your diagnosis?
Acute osteomyelitis of the right tibia
|
What are the proper managements?
| |
1. Starting intravenous anti-staphylococcus antibiotic (cloxacillin
150 MKD)
2. Needle aspiration of the right tibia.
|
The needle aspiration did not obtain any pus. |
|
What should be the next investigation?
Bone scan................... see figure 1
| |
Figure 1: 99 Technitium scan:
Three-phase bone scan of both legs.
The dynamic and blood pool imaging shows increased
perfusion and blood pool in the right leg.The static images show intense
increased uptake at the metaphysis of the right distal tibia, compared
with normal uptake on the left side. The remaining skeleton
is unremarkable. |
The surgery at the right distal tibia obtained 50 cc of pus under the periosteum.
Gram stain : see figure 2
|
|

|
| |
Figure 2 : Gram
stain revealed numerous PMN with gram positive cocci in cluster |
| Course in the hospital |
|
|
|
|
|
After the surgical drainage the fever gradually subsided.
She was given intravenous cloxacillin for 4 weeks.
|
|
| Final
Diagnosis : Acute
osteomyelitis of the right tibia |
Discussion: Acute
osteomyelitis
Pathogenesis
|
>
|
Disease of young children because of the rich vascular
supply of rapidly growing bones. |
|
>
|
Hematogenous in origin |
|
>
|
One-third of patients has minor trauma to the affected
extremity prior to infection |
|
>
|
Metaphysis of long bone is the most common site of infection
|
|
>
|
Risk of joint involvement in the following setting |
| |
Hip and shoulder joint; metaphysis of the proximal
femur and humerous are intracapsular
Age < 18 months; transphyseal vessels providing a connection
between the metaphysis and epiphysis |
|
Etiology |
|
>
|
S.aureus is the most common cause |
|
>
|
The specific microorganism that is associated with the
age of the patient |
|
|
|
| |
Table 1: The specific microorganism that is associated
with the age of the patient (from ref. 2) |
|
Clinical Manifestation
|
| |
Most frequent manifestation: fever, pain and reluctance
to use affected extremities. |
| |
Physical signs:
|
>
|
Focal swelling, tenderness, warmth,
erythema, usually over metaphysic of a long bone. |
|
>
|
Local swelling and redness mean that
the infection has spread out of the metaphysis into the subperiosteal
space. |
|
>
|
Long bone is principally involved
in osteomyelitis. (picture 4) |
|
|
|
| |
Figure 4: Site of acute osteomyelitis
in whom a single bone was involved. Shaded areas constitute
sites of approximately 75% of cases. Miscellaneous sites accounting
for 5% are not shown. (from ref. 3) |
|
>
|
Differential diagnosis from cellulitis:
In case of osteomyelitis, tenderness is out of proportion to
soft tissue swelling |
|
>
|
Differential diagnosis from pyogentic
arthritis: In case of pyogenic arthritis, there is exaggerated
immobility of the joint but lack of point of tenderness over
the metaphysis. |
|
Laboratory diagnosis |
| |
1. Needle aspiration: Most directly confirmed diagnosis
by examination and culture of infected material |
| |
2. Complete blood count: Leukocytosis and thrombocytosis |
| |
3. Acute phase reactant: Erythrocyte sedimentation rate
(ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) |
| |
Table2: Dynamic of acute phase reactant
in acute oseteomyelitis (from ref. 3) |
| |
| |
% Abnormal
|
Value
|
Peak
(Days after initiation of treatment)
|
Return to normal
(Since treatment)
|
|
ESR
|
90%
|
40-60 mm/hr
|
3-5 days
|
3-4 weeks
|
|
CRP
|
98
|
Mean 83 mg/L
|
2 day
|
7-10 days
|
|
| |
4. Radiologic findings |
| |
| |
4.1 Plain radiograph
| |
3 days of onset: deep soft tissue
swelling, loss of the visible tissue planes around the
bone
10-20 days after onset: osteolytic lesions, periosteal
elevation due to subcortical purulence and periosteal
new bone formation
1 month: sclerosis of bone |
| 4.2 Radionuclide scan: Technetium-labeled
methylene diphosphonate isotope |
| |
The uptake is enhanced when osteoblastic
activity is increased
The sensitivity is 80-100%. |
| 4.3 Magnetic resonance Imaging
(MRI ) |
| |
The sensitivity is 92-100%.
Differentiate cellulitis from osteomyelitis using
signal alterations in soft tissue
Differentiate acute from chronic osteomyelitis |
|
|
|
Treatment
|
1.
|
Antibiotic selection is based on knowledge
of likely bacterial pathogens at various ages, the results of Gram
stain of aspirated material, and special considerations. |
| |
Table 3: Antibiotic Selection for
initial treatment of osteomyelitis (modified from ref. 3) |
| |
| Age |
Likely pathogen |
Empirical antibiotics |
| Newborn |
S. aureus
GBS
Enteric gram -ve |
Nafcillin (or cloxacillin)
100 MKD q 6 hr AND Gentamicin 5-7.5 MKD q 8 hr
OR
Nafcillin (or cloxacillin) 100 MKD q 6 hr AND cefotaxime
150 MKD IV q 8 hr |
| < 3 years |
S.aureus
H. influenza b |
Nafcillin (or cloxacillin)
150 MKD IV q 6 hr AND Cefotaxime 100-150 MKD q 6 hr OR
Ceftriaxone 100 MKD q 12 hr OR Cefuroxime 72-150
MKD q 8 hr OR Ampicillin-sulbactam 300 MKD q 6
hr |
| > 3 years |
S. aureus |
Nafcillin (or cloxacillin)
150 MKD IV q 6 hr OR
Clindamycin 30 MKD IV q 6-8 hr OR Cefazolin 100 MKD
IV q 8 hr |
|
|
2.
|
Indications for surgery |
| |
Prolonged fever, erythema, pain and
swelling
Persistent bacteremia despite adequate antibiotic
Soft tissue or periosteal abscess
Formation of sinus tract
Presence of necrotic, nonviable bone |
|
3.
|
Duration of treatment |
| |
At least 3-6 weeks. If duration of treatment
less than 3 weeks, it is associated with higher rates of relapse.
Plain radiograph at the end of treatment should be performed to document
maximal anticipated destruction and served as a baseline for further
studies to follow a possible complication. |
|
4.
|
Sequential parenteral-oral antibiotics: |
| |
This can be successful. However, the adherence
to oral regimens is critical. Dosage of antibiotics in the oral phase
is generally two to three times the usual oral dose (Table 4... from
ref 3). |
| |
Table 4. Dosage of antibiotics commonly
used in the oral phase of treatment of osteomyelitis |
| |
|
Antibiotic
|
mg/kg/day
|
Doses/Day
|
| Dicloxacillin |
75-100
|
4
|
| Cephalexin |
100-150
|
4
|
| Clindamycin |
30
|
3-4
|
|
|
|
References and suggested further readings
1. Nelson JD. Osteomyelitis and Suppurative Arthritis. In:
Behrman RE,Kliegman RM, Jenson HB: Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. 16th
ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders company; 2000. Page 776-780.
2. Carek PJ, Dickerson LM, Sak JL. Diagnosis and management of osteomyelitis.
Am Fam Phy.2001; 63(12):2413-20.
3. Kathleen MG. Osteomyelitis. In: Long S, Pickering L and Prober C: Principles
and Practice of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. 2nd ed. Philadelphia. Churchill
Living stone; 2003. Page 467-474.
|